热门站点| 世界资料网 | 专利资料网 | 世界资料网论坛
收藏本站| 设为首页| 首页

关于对《认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构审批登记与监督管理办法》审批条件若干解释的通知

作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-07-13 08:28:15  浏览:8720   来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载

关于对《认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构审批登记与监督管理办法》审批条件若干解释的通知

国家认证认可监督管理委员会


关于对《认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构审批登记与监督管理办法》审批条件若干解释的通知


各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市、新疆生产建设兵团质量技术监督局, 各直属检验检疫局:
国家认证认可监督管理委员会、国家质量监督检验检疫总局、国家工商行政管理总局、对外贸易经济合作部于2002年4月2日联合发布了《认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构审批登记与监督管理办法》(国认可联[2002]21号,以下简称《办法》)。为了确保对其中有关审批要求的一致理解和准确实施,根据《办法》第四十条的规定,我委对《办法》中的审批条件作如下解释,并对申请时应提交的文件做如下说明:
第一部分 关于设立认证机构
一、《办法》第八条规定:设立认证机构应当具备以下条件:
(一)有固定的经营场所;
(二)有与其从事认证业务相适应的注册资本(金)、办公条件、人力资源和技术资源;
(三)符合有关认证机构要求的质量管理体系文件;
(四)法律法规及国家认监委依法规定的其他条件。
对有关内容解释如下:
(一)注册资本(金)不低于300万元;
(二)从事管理体系认证的认证机构,要具有10名以上(含10名)专职国家注册审核员(其中至少5名是国家注册高级审核员)或同等的认证人员;
(三)从事产品认证的机构具有10名以上(含10名)专职国家注册检查员(其中至少5名是国家注册高级检查员)或同等的认证人员;
(四)对特殊情况,具体条件由国家认监委根据具体情况决定。
二、《办法》第十条(一)款规定:申请者向国家认监委提出申请,提交书面申请报告并附相关证明材料。
解释如下:
申请设立认证机构的应当向国家认监委提交以下文件:
(一)申请书;
(二)组织章程;
(三)《企业名称预先核准通知书》(复印件);
(四)经营场所使用证明(复印件);
(五)拟聘用的主要负责人、专职人员的身份证明(复印件)、聘用和应聘说明和专业资格证明(复印件),取得境外机构注册资格的审核员,还需取得中国国家认证人员培训认可委员会(CNAT)出具的等同注册资格确认文件;
(六)质量管理体系文件(包括ISO/IEC 导则 62、65、66所要求的文件等);
(七)收费标准及认证收费用途的说明;
(八)国家认监委要求的其他文件、证明材料。
第二部分 关于设立认证培训机构
一、《办法》第九条规定:设立认证培训机构应当具备以下条件:
(一)有固定的经营场所;
(二)有与其从事业务相适应的注册资本(金)、培训教学设施、人力资源和办公条件;
(三)符合有关认证培训机构要求的质量管理体系文件;
(四)拥有自有(授权)的知识产权培训课程;
(五)法律法规及国家认监委依法规定的其他条件。
对有关内容解释如下:
(一)有固定的教室等教学设施;
(二)注册资本(金)不低于100万元;
(三)具有3名以上(含3名)具有培训教师资格的专职教师,每项课程(指质量管理体系培训、环境管理体系培训、职业健康安全管理体系培训、产品认证等)的专职教师不得少于2名;
(四)仅拥有境外授权知识产权的培训课程的机构适用于《办法》第十五条有关合作机构的规定;
(五)对特殊情况,具体条件由国家认监委根据具体情况决定。
二、《办法》第十条(一)款规定:申请者向国家认监委提出申请,提交书面申请报告并附相关证明材料。
解释如下:
申请设立认证培训机构的应当向国家认监委提交以下文件:
(一)申请书;
(二)组织章程;
(三)《企业名称预先核准通知书》(复印件);
(四)经营场所使用证明(复印件);
(五)拟聘用的机构主要负责人、培训教师及管理人员身份证明(复印件)、聘用和应聘说明和培训教师资格证明(复印件),取得与CNAT签署互认协议的其他国家认可机构的培训教师资格的,还需取得CNAT出具的等同资格确认文件;
(六)质量管理体系文件(包括IATCA培训课程提供者准则所要求的有关文件等);
(七)收费标准及收费用途的说明等;
(八)培训大纲和教材,非自有知识产权的还应提供授权证书(复印件);
(九)国家认监委要求的其他文件、证明材料。
第三部分 关于设立认证咨询机构
一、《办法》第十二条规定:设立认证咨询机构应当具备以下条件:
(一)有固定的经营场所;
(二)有与其从事业务相适应的注册资本(金)、办公条件、人力资源和技术资源;
(三)有关认证咨询机构要求的质量管理体系文件;
(四)法律法规及国家认监委依法规定的其他条件。
对有关内容解释如下:
(一)注册资本(金)不低于50万元;
(二)具有5名以上专职国家注册咨询师或审核员(其中至少2人为高级咨询师或高级审核员)或同等资格的咨询人员;
(三)符合有关认证咨询机构要求的质量管理体系文件,包括:合同评审、咨询项目策划与咨询实施计划编制、咨询提供过程、符合性审核、咨询机构人员管理与培训、分支机构的控制(存在时)、不合格控制与纠正措施、内部质量体系审核与管理评审、文件和资料控制、保密、客户投诉与跟踪服务;
(四)对特殊情况,具体条件由国家认监委根据具体情况决定。
二、《办法》第十三条(一)款规定:申请者向拟设立机构所在地省、自治区、直辖市质量技术监督局提出申请,提交书面申请报告并附相关证明材料。
解释如下:
申请设立认证咨询机构的应当向拟设立机构所在地省、自治区、直辖市质量技术监督局(外商投资认证咨询机构应当向所在地直属出入境检验检疫局)提交下列文件:
(一)申请书;
(二)组织章程;
(三)《企业名称预先核准通知书》(复印件);
(四)经营场所使用证明(复印件);
(五)拟聘用机构主要负责人、专业人员的身份证明(复印件)、聘用和应聘说明和专业资格证明(复印件);
(六)质量管理体系文件;
(七)国家认监委要求的其他文件、证明材料。
第四部分 关于设立外商投资认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构(包括中外合资、合作机构和外商独资机构)
一、《办法》第十五条规定: 外商投资认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构(包括中外合资、合作机构和外商独资机构)应为有限责任公司,其设立除应当分别具备第八条、第九条、第十二条规定的条件外,注册资本不得低于35万美元,外方投资者还应当在所在国取得国家认可资格或者承认,并具有3年以上的相关服务经验。
2003年12月11日前暂不审批外资控股的认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构的设立申请,2005年12月11日前暂不审批外商独资的认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构的设立申请。
对有关内容解释如下:
除注册资本(金)以外,前面第一部分、第二部分、第三部分对《办法》第八条、第九条、第十二条规定有关内容作出的解释,对设立外商投资认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构同样适用。
二、《办法》第十七条(一)款规定申请者向拟设立机构所在地直属出入境检验检疫局提出申请,提交书面申请报告并附相关证明材料。
解释如下:
办理申请时,除了应当按本解释第一、二、三部分的规定向审批机关提交相应的文件以外,还应提交以下文件:
(一)合资合同;
(二)项目建议书和可行性报告;
(三)投资各方的资信证明、登记注册证明(复印件)、
法定代表人证明(复印件);
(四)外方投资者的国家认可资格或承认证明(复印件)
和业务介绍。
第五部分 关于外国认证机构及认证培训、咨询机构在华设立常驻代表机构
《办法》第二十一条规定:外国认证机构和认证培训机构拟在中国境内设立常驻代表机构按以下程序办理:
(一)申请者向国家认监委提出申请,提交书面申请报告并附上相应证明材料。
《办法》第二十二条规定:外国认证咨询机构拟在中国境内设立常驻代表机构的审批和登记注册按以下程序办理:
(一)申请者向拟设立机构所在地直属出入境检验检疫局提出申请,提交书面申请报告并附上相关证明材料。
解释如下:申请时应当向审批机关提交以下文件:
(一)由该机构董事长或者总经理签署的申请书,内容包括常驻代表机构名称、负责人员、业务范围、驻在期限、驻在地点等;
(二)由该机构所在国或者所在地区的有关当局出具的开业合法证书;
(三)由同该机构有业务往来的金融机构出具的资本信用证明书;
(四)该机构委任常驻代表机构人员的授权书和他们的简历;
(五)该机构的国家认可资格或承认证明(复印件)和业务介绍。
(六)法律法规要求的其他文件、证明材料。

二○○二年四月三十日


下载地址: 点击此处下载


The SOE reform in China
Zhou Dayong
Summer semester 2003
Europa-University Viadrina,Germany

Abstract:
The essay tries to study the process of the state-owned enterprise (SOE) reform in China. Chinese economic reform resulted in significant influences on all social aspects, SOEs as an especially economic sector suffers a change both in internal management as well in the outside economic environment. I try to discuss in the essay, that the Chinese SOE reform has made large progress, however, SOE can’t conquer many problems by itself, the resolution of SOE lies in elimination of SOE by a further reform including property transition and construction of a fairer market.


Outline
1. History of the SOE reform in China
2. The main problems left in the reform
3. The reasons of SOE problem behind
4. Argue of some reform plans and suggestion
5. Conclusion


1. The history of the SOEs reform in China
1.1 the establishment of SOE
In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came into power in Mainland China. One goal of the CCP was to lead China into a modern socialism society. In economic scale, it meant mainly industrialization. According to CCP’s policy, the form of industrial organization must be based upon state owned enterprises. The state-owned industrial system was set up by two ways. One was the new enterprise after the liberation. At the end WWII, most industrial sectors in China, such as communication network, transportation and power industry were destroyed and had to be rebuilt, at the same time, military industries and financial sector e.g. banking system was directly nationalized from the former control of Gongmin Party. Another way was transformation from the private ownership to state-owned enterprises. The private properties were regulated under state management, in some cases, for instance in commercial scale, the former private enterprises were bought by local government gradually. Till 1952, about 83% of industrial companies were controlled by the state; a socialism economic system was announced established. (Fig 1)
1.2 The reform began from 1978
Until Chinese economic reform began in 1978, public ownership in forms of state-owned and collectivized were only legal ownership of property. In industrial sector, the enterprises were controlled respectively under central or local governments, the latter made decisions for the enterprises, the enterprises were not profit seeking economic entities, they were simply workshops to execute centrally set policies.
In 1970s, the discontent of economic situation accumulated constantly, because the defects of central planning system became obviously more and more. Around 1978, the rural reform took place from grass roots and spread quickly, till 1982, the collectivized people commune had to be abolished. In company with the reform, the free market in a certain degree was developed. At the same time, the problem of lack of autonomy in SOE, which led to low efficiency, was also taken into account. Therefore, from 1978 on, the Communist Party, under the leading of Deng Xiaoping, put hand to solve the SOE problem. From 1978 to 1984, the efforts of the reform concentrated on giving the SOEs more autonomy by allowing them increased authority over the allocation of their profits, and limited production autonomy. The rest profits could be used either to finance increased investments or to pay bonuses to employees. Besides, administrative control over SOEs was decentralized to local governments. But as the prices were still centrally determined and SOEs did not realize the cost of their fixed and working capital, the reforms did not improve much the resource allocation or the utilization of capital. (1)

1.3 Contract is the main form in the second phase.
From 1985 to 1992 was the second phase of the SOE reform. The policy named Zhenqi Fenkai (separating government from enterprises), the central government decided to turn SOEs into truly independent production and management entities, and stipulate that enterprises must take responsibilities for their own profits and losses by means of contracts and leasing. The common practice was: the enterprises sign a manage contract with the responsible authorities. Under the contract, enterprises were not only allowed to retain the extra profits after they had fulfilled the contracted quotas, but also allowed to arrange their own manage including dismiss or enroll personnel. By the end of 1987, about 80% of state-owned industrial enterprises adopted the contracts system. In 1991, over 90% of the previously contracted enterprises signed the second round of contracts. Meanwhile, based on the first round contract practice, the content of the contract was improved; the authority introduced more rational norms to examine the fulfillment of contract. A multiple index system was formed, which included economic efficiency index, development potentiality index and management index etc.
During this period, the practice of shareholding reform appeared as well. This new creature was adopted at first by village enterprises, which come from the former collective enterprises. The village enterprises were always short of capital, so they raised money from the village residents. Along with the reform moved forward from countryside to cities, the shareholding system was also introduced into SOE reform. Early in April 1984 Chinese reform committee organized a seminar to discuss the exploitation of shareholding in SOE reform. That conference drew a conclusion that shareholding system is a rational way to restructure the collective and state owned enterprises in cities. In July the same year, the first shareholding company after Chinese liberation—Beijing Tianqiao department store (shareholding) came onto horizon. Till 1991, there were already 709 state owned enterprises restructured along shareholding system. These enterprises included industrial sector companies, trade companies, also financial enterprises, construction enterprises etc.
Besides, in the second phase of SOE reform, tax system had also a great change. Instead of handing in profit, SOEs paid a certain portion of tax according to their revenue level. The State and local government collected tax separately; this measure was implemented to loose the relation between SOE and local authority.
However, during this period, the SOEs showed their weakness in competition with the new developed private companies, joint venture companies and township and village enterprises, because at one side, the manager of SOEs didn’t get use to do business in a free market, the attitude of waiting, relying on government and begging for help were widespread. At another side, the relationship between government and enterprises became more complicated, because, although under the contract system, the government have no right to interfere in the SOEs management, they still rely on each other: the government need the SOE to have good performance in order to settle surplus labor forces and continue to play a role in maintain the social stability, at the same time, to increase the government’s revenue to deal with the raising infrastructure investment and other expense. The SOE, on the other side, need the protection of the authority, in order to obtain more chance to get loans, subsidizes or orders in government arranged projects. Besides, even though most of direct subsidies form the state have been cancelled, many domestic savings were also channeled into SOEs, because banks had been directed to take up the role of making "loans" to SOEs instead of the state. The total of non-performing loans has grown so large that it started to endanger the banking system. (2)

1.4 The MES is the key point in the third phase of the reform and the achievements
Form 1993 on, the reform moved into the third phase, the aim called setting up the modern enterprises system (MES). The Third Plenary Session of the 14th Party Central Committee in November 1993 proposed: "It is the inevitable request for market economy to set up modern enterprise system, it is a direction of the SOE reform of China. "This indicates that SOE reform enters a new stage of system innovation. In 1994 the State Council determined to chose 100 state-run large and medium-sized enterprises to launch an experiment to implement restructure along MES. The basic demands of the experiment were to "define right and responsibility clearly, separate government function from enterprise management, and operate scientifically”. Those requirements were in fact the basic characters concerning modern enterprises system. Along the policy of building MES system, and based upon the development of the whole economy, there were many achievements reached in the third phase.
1) By 2000, most large and middle scale SOEs have set up modern enterprise system tentatively. According to the investigation in 2473 enterprises of State Statistics Bureau 2000, 2016 enterprises have restructured, account 81.5%. Among those enterprises, 603 turned to Co., Ltd., accounts for 29.9%; 713 were restructured to limited companies, accounts for 35.4%; the number of solely state-owned company is 700, accounts for 34.7%. As for their management, 82.2% established shareholders’ meeting, 95.1% established the board of directors, and the board of supervisors has been established in 84.5% of enterprises. Therefore, corporate governance structure has already taken shape in SOEs.
2) In this phase, during" the Ninth Five-Year Plan", China began to adjust the state-run economic layout strategically, The idea called Zhuada Fangxiao (to grab the big ones and let the small ones go). The reform for medium and large SOEs focused on fostering a batch of trans-regional, inter-trade, inter-ownership big SOE groups through reorganizing, transforming, uniting annex. In 1997, the number of national large-scale enterprise groups expands to 120. For instance, under approval by the State Council, China Petrochemical Corporation, China Oil and Natural Gas Corporation were predominated to two large groups, whose assets of enterprise group reached in 40 billion dollars, such measure improved the intensification degree and international competitiveness of Chinese petrochemical industry greatly. Another example was in telecommunication market, six major SOE telecom groups (China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, China satellite communication, China railway communication) were predominated. So a new form of competition in field of communication service took shape.
By the end of 2001, national key enterprises add up to 2710, total assets up to 1,280,450 million dollar. Among 179 super-huge enterprise groups, whose business income is over 500 million dollar, there are 165 state-owned or state-holding enterprise groups.
3) During this phase, separating government function from enterprise management was strengthened harder than before. Chinese government started administrative organization structure reform in 1998. Through this administrative restructure, the departments of the State Council reduced from 40 to 29. At provincial level, government departments reduced from 55 on average to 40, about 20% departments were simply. Some departments were cancelled totally. The cancellation of government departments indicated that the SOE stay in the charge of specialized official department manages changed completely. Meanwhile, the administration rank of the state-owned enterprise were cancelled, some administrative approval procedure were simplified.
4) To relieve the social burden of SOEs, re-employment service center were set up to shunt the redundant staff of enterprises. It has been a great difficult problem of the SOE reform from begin on that enterprises are overstaffed. It is an important measure of revitalizing the SOEs to dismiss and distribute workers. In June 1998, the state council required all regions to set up re-employment service center system. National Ministry of Labor and Social Security emphasized that the laid-off worker in SOEs must 100% enter the re-employment service center. The re-employment service center determined to provide serve functions such as grant basic living cost, withhold social insurance, organize job training and launch employment etc. for laid-off worker. The fund, which used for ensuring laid-off worker's basic life and paying the social insurance premium, come from financial budget, enterprise as well as societies (namely form contribution or from laid-off worker themselves), each part bears 1/3 of the whole fund. The re-employment service center provides service for laid-off workers for at longest 3 years. When they can’t reemploy after this period, can still enjoy unemployment compensation or the society relieve according to relevant regulation.
In this reform stage, re-employment service center played a positive role on maintain social stability. From 1998 to the end of 2001, 25,500,000 laid-off workers emerged (Fig 3) in national state-owned enterprises, among them more than 17 million people were reemployed, more than 3 million people retired. However, re-employment service center was only a transitional institute, because the SOE had to still take responsibility to settle down those laid off workers. According to a new policy, all laid-off workers after 2001 are treat as unemployed and have to enter free labor force market.
5) In order to extricate SOE from predicament, especially to resolve the problem of high liability-asset ratio, by December 2000, 580 SOEs began to implement debt-to-share swap, that mean the enterprises’ debt were recalculated as share (enterprises’ equity), so that the interest burden of SOEs were lightened. In the process, most of unperformed loans would be calculated as shares, which would be gathered and supervised by a new state commission-- State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC). Till 2001, the total amount of money of debt-to-equity swap account 40,5 billion dollars, and the result was that the average asset-liability ratio of debt-to-share swapped enterprises dropped from more than 70% to under 50%.

2. The main problems left in the reform
After three steps reform, the SOE acquired more autonomy, as we have seen, the whole economic circumstance were also better. But because the reform did not touch the socialism idea from begin on, thus the transition of ownership of SOE was left basically unchanged, the defects of SOE could not changed completely. In the context of China’s economic reforms, there are still a few problems in SOE sector existed and have also a deep influence.
First of all, the interventions from the government still maintained influence in SOE. The administrative relation between enterprise and government is still remaining. Even the Local State Assets management office was established, it belong to the same bureaucratic system like former authorities. It can appoint or remove senior executives of SOEs. If enterprise applies to the broad structure, the directors in broad are appointed by it. The office has also a say in the transfer of holdings, corporate mergers, closures or other major changes to the enterprises, it is also charged with the tasks of clarifying property rights and settling disputes (3) . It seemed that the state assets supervisory takes the place of former authority above the SOEs. Moreover, the local government maintains still strong power in local enterprise, they rely on each other as we discussed above. So long as the enterprises are state-owned, whether they are big groups, stock companies or little entities, it is difficult to shaking off the directly or indirectly control from the government.
Secondly, because of the long tradition, enterprises are still taking responsibilities for their employees in pension, medical areas, therefore the so-called “soft budget constraint” cannot be given up completely. Although we have discussed that the Chinese government has managed to start re-employment plan, SOEs also take a part of the fund to support the plan. Correspondenly, government had to shoulder some failures resulted from the mismanagement of SOEs’ and avoid from their bankruptcy, in order to prevent the enterprise from bankrupcy and thus endanger the social stability.
Thirdly, the management of SOEs has low quality compare with other economic sectors. Though SOEs have produced an average 10% growth rate in the value of industrial output during the period 1978-98, this rate is considerably below the average of other sectors. The problem has two reasons. One of them is lacking of the inner incentive of the managers. The SOE managers are not entrepreneurs in the true sense, but bureaucrats at any rate. Their appointment by the government not basically according to their managerial capability, but based on their rankings in the bureaucratic hierarchy through the politic system. Another factor concerns the supervision within the SOE, it is also lacking in most cases. In practice, the position of supervisor in a enterprise is normally taken by staff within the enterprise and in most cases, the position of president of the supervision committee is taken by somebody within the enterprise, who is under the leadership of the directors and managers in his ranks both at work and in the Party. This system makes it very hard for the supervision committee to fully perform its authority (4) .
Fourth, the high liability-asset ratio is also regarded as a fatal problem of SOEs. It was observed, that during the reform period, the liability-asset ratio of industrial SOEs rose from around 11% in 1978 to approximately 65% in 1997. In as many as one-fourth of industrial SOEs, liabilities have even come to exceed assets; these enterprises are in fact insolvent. The World Bank suggests that in debt restructuring may be necessary for the most heavily indebted enterprises to bankrupt. After the implement of debt-to-share swap, the ratio decreased, but the debtor, in most cases are banks, didn’t collect the loan back, so it made the SOE even harder to get new loan for production. (5)
Furthermore, the whole process of the SOE reform companied by a serials of social problems, in compare to some difficulties such as lack or reserve labor force, ageing of the equipments, the most troublesome is the unemployment in large scales. In addition, in rural areas, millions of flowing population has been produced because of the bankruptcy and low profitability of the township and village enterprise. In urban China there are frequent reports about workers’ unrest. Although until now China still maintain a relative political stability, the menace will not fade away in a short time.

对外贸易经济合作部、国家工商行政管理局关于加强桑蚕茧统一收购管理工作的通知

对外贸易经济合作部、国家工商行政管理局


对外贸易经济合作部、国家工商行政管理局关于加强桑蚕茧统一收购管理工作的通知



1994-3-14

对外贸易经济合作部、国家工商行政管理局关于

加强桑蚕茧统一收购管理工作的通知〔1994〕外经贸管发第271号



各省、自治区、直辖市及计划单列市经贸委(厅),外贸局,工商行政管理局:

丝绸是我国的传统出口商品,蚕丝类和坯绸是国家组织统一联合经营的特别重要的出口商品。为贯彻落实1994年3月14日国务院办公厅《关于继续加强桑蚕茧收购经营管理的通知》(国办〔1994〕11号明电)的精神(见附件),特作如下通知:

一、蚕茧收购继续由中国丝绸进出口总公司及各省、自治区、直辖市和计划单列市丝绸公司统一经营管理。根据各地实际情况,丝绸公司可委托有关单位进行蚕茧代购工作。凡具备收烘设施和技术条件的代购单位(收茧站),必须持有省(区、市)丝绸公司签发的蚕茧收购委托书和工商行政管理部门核发的营业执照,方能进行蚕茧收烘业务;未经许可的任何单位和个人,一律不得收购蚕茧。

二、为维护蚕茧收购秩序、加强统一经营管理,各地工商行政管理部门要继续坚持实行蚕茧省内外准运证核查制度。凡属正常的调节、交易活动,必须持有中国丝绸进出口总公司或省级丝绸公司的准运证才能调运。对无证调运者,工商行政管理部门应予查扣,并按情节轻重作出处罚。

三、各地工商行政管理部门要配合当地有关单位,在蚕茧收购期间,组织力量进行检查监督,打击非法经营活动,对未经许可私建茧灶的单位和个人必须予以劝阻。劝阻无效者,一经查实,按工商行政管理法规给予没收蚕茧、罚款等处罚。

四、各地主管部门要密切配合,保证当地蚕茧收购任务的完成。

附件:国务院办公厅关于继续加强桑蚕茧收购经营管理的通知

一九九四年五月十日

国务院办公厅关于继续加强桑蚕茧收购经营管理的通知 丝绸是我国的传统出口商品,蚕丝类和坯绸是国家组织统一联合经营的特别重要的出口商品。国务院对这一商品的经营管理体制的改革问题十分重视,目前正在研究之中。在新的经营管理办法出台之前,为稳定蚕茧收购秩序,防止“大战”再起,保护蚕农的利益,保证出口货源,现对蚕茧收购及有关事项通知如下:

一、蚕茧收购继续由中国丝绸进出口总公司及其省(自治区、直辖市)和计划单列市公司统一经营管理。根据各省实际情况,丝绸公司可委托有关部门进行蚕茧代购工作,但代购部门必须具有工商行政部门的营业执照以及省(区、市)丝绸公司签发的蚕茧收购委托书,方能参与收购,未经许可的单位和个人一律不得收购蚕茧。

二、继续实行桑蚕茧国家定价。各地收购部门要严格执行国家有关标准,不得抬级抬价、压级压价,严禁打“白条”,以确保蚕农利益。关于一九九四年桑蚕鲜茧收购价格,将由国家计委商有关部门确定下达。

三、各地要继续贯彻“巩固提高,稳定发展”的蚕茧生产方针,加强蚕种管理,保证蚕种质量;制止小丝厂盲目发展,注意产供销协调。

四、严格按规定提交蚕改费,做到专款专用,不得截留、挪用。要稳定技术队伍,巩固生产基础。

五、要按照社会主义市场经济的要求,积极培育茧丝绸的市场机制,不断探索茧丝绸经营管理体制改革的新路子。各地余缺的蚕茧要引导到中国茧丝绸交易市场进行交易。

一九九四年三月十四日





版权声明:所有资料均为作者提供或网友推荐收集整理而来,仅供爱好者学习和研究使用,版权归原作者所有。
如本站内容有侵犯您的合法权益,请和我们取得联系,我们将立即改正或删除。
京ICP备14017250号-1